《表征中国社会的话语:基于元旦社论的历时研究》选取58篇《人民日报》元旦社论(1949—2006)这一当代中国政治话语的特定体裁作为语料，进行跨时期(1949—1966，1967—1978，1979—2006)的定性与定量分析，从不同的维度系统地揭示了社会语言学中语言与社会共变的规律。中国社会的变迁在这一政治话语中主要体现于体裁结构、社会主体和社会行为的话语表征方式以及评价性资源的历时变异等方面。
研究表明，这些语言使用方面的历时变化，在很大程度上体现了机构权威以及个人权威与公众(包括其他机构或个人)之间的社会关系，已从权势不对称关系逐渐趋向平等关系，更加凸显对中华民族这一共同身份的认同。作为当代中国政治话语的特定体裁，《人民日报》元旦社论语篇中已经出现了话语民主化趋势。
编辑推荐
《表征中国社会的话语:基于元旦社论的历时研究》为外教社博学文库之一。 目录
Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Why the study7
1.2 Why the NVEs？
1.3 Historical demarcation of the NVEs
1.4 Identifying the NYEs as a genre of political discourse
1.4.1 Defining genre
1.4.2 NYEs as a genre of political discourse
1.5 Elucidating key notions
1.5.1 Ideology
1.5.2 Discourse as social representations
1.6 The purpose of the study
1.7 Outline of the dissertation
Chapter Two Literature Review
2.1 introduction
2.2 SFL approach to political discourse analysis
2.3 Corpus-based multi-dimensional approach to political discourse analysis
2.4 Socio-cognitive approach to political discourse analysis.
2.5 Critical discourse analysis
2.6 Contrastive rhetoric approach to political discourse Analysis
2.7 Pragmatic approach to political discourse analysis
2.8 Cognitive linguistic approach to political discourse analysis
2.9 Sociolinguistic approach to political discourse
2.10 Content analysis in communication studies
2.11 Summary
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework and Methodology
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Establishing a theoretical framework for diachronic analysis of the NYEs
3.2.1 The model of social context and language in SFL
3.2.2 van Dijk's socio-cognitive model for political discourse analysis
3.2.3 The model of semiotic change in SFL
3.2.4 The integrated model for the diachronic analysis of the NYEs
3.3 Analytical tools for analyzing diachronic change of social relations in the NYEs
3.3.1 Generic structure potential analysis
3.3.2 Content analysis
3.3.3 Representation of social actors and social actions
3.3.3.1 Representation of social actors
3.3.3.2 Representation of social actions
3.3.4 Appraisal system
3.4 Methodology
3.4.1 Research questions
3.4.2 Methodology for the analysis of the NYEs
3.4.2.1 Data
3.4.2.2 Procedure
3.4.3 Methodology for the survey of social attitudes
…… 文摘
版权页：
插图：
We have to point out that critical discourse analysis in particular anddiscourse analysis in general are multidisciplinary or tansdisciplinary in natureand there are a myriad of approaches to （critical） discourse analysis （Fairclough Wodak, 1997; van Dijk, 2001b）, for instance, among which van Dijk' socio-cognitive approach introduced in Section 2.4 above is one of the competitiveparalells. Another prominent framework for critical discourse analysis isWodak's interdisciplinary discourse-historical approach, which usuallyemploys the principle of triangulation, incorporating field work, ethnographyand other techniques and methodologically combining historical, socio-political and linguistic perspectives in a pluralistic approach （Wodak, 2001b）.One empirical research using this framework is Wodak, et al. （1999）, whichwas concerned with the analysis of the relationships between the discursiveconstruction of national sameness and difference leading to political and socialexclusion of specific out-groups. Other influential frameworks for criticaldiscourse analysis such as Kress and van Leeuwen's muhimodal discourseanalysis approach （Kress van Leeuwen, 1996, 2001）, which is actually asocial-semiotic approach, taking SFL as its theoretical scaffolding, particularlytargeted at 'considering the communicative potential of visual devices in themedia' （Wodak, 2001a, p. 8）. van Leeuwen's （1995, 1996） systematic analysesof representations of social actors and social actions can serve as analyticalto
ls for the analysis of the NYEs. For limited space here, van Leeuwen'sframework will be elaborated in Chapter 3.
| ISBN | 9787544619424 |
|---|---|
| 出版社 | 上海外语教育出版社 |
| 作者 | 黄莹 |
| 尺寸 | 32 |