振宇英语大学英语6级考试历年真题:全译文点评与全真模拟(2007年12月-2011年6月) [平装] 9787565604300

《振宇英语?大学英语6级考试历年真题:全译文点评与全真模拟(2007年12月-2011年6月)》全真模拟试卷与详解根据《基本要求》和《高等学校应用能力考试大纲》精心策划和编写。全书共有十套新颖实用的试卷。作者在2005年编写《高等学校应用能力（B级）考试全真试卷与详解》之后，总结了近年来考试真题的特点和考试的发展方向，编写了本册模拟试卷。在编写过程中，作者尽量使模拟题的难易程度、题型、测试重点、考试指令等与实际考试相一致，考生通过对该模拟试卷的练习，能够尽快熟悉考试内容、题型和应试技巧。 《振宇英语?大学英语6级考试历年真题:全译文点评与全真模拟(2007年12月-2011年6月)》：试题、选项、篇章全翻译的真题精典 英语六级6大题型权威深度全方位考点细解密 英语六级8套真题全译文点线面最透彻超精解 六级资深命题研究专家2套预测试卷超值赠送 所有试题及答案选项与篇章1字不落全部翻译 上海交通大学是全国大学英语四、六级考试命题中心和阅卷中心，在推动全国高校大学英语四、六级考试改革中作出了巨大贡献。“振字英语”深入学习考委会精神，准确把握命题趋势，透彻分析历年真题，力争作出权威解读。 方振宇，英语专家、文化学者、出版人、策划人、“振宇英语”创始人，外语教学与研究出版社“振宇英语”系列丛书总主编，外研社荣誉作者。曾任国家级媒体记者、翻译、电台英语节目主持人、“振宇英语”专栏撰稿人、大学英语系主任、大学英语专业顾问及特聘专家教授，曾在近20多个国家游学访问，在全国多所大学为大学老师和同学进行有关英语文化与英语测试领域的巡回讲座，反响强烈。率领振宇英语团队目前出版发行“振宇英语”系列图书近200个品种，总发行量累积超过3000万册，部分图书成为全国近1500所高校馆藏珍典，还有多册图书成为知名大学考研和考博指定参考书目，影响深远。 版权页： 插图： HowgOodareyouat saying“rio”？Formany,it’S surprisinglydifficult.Thisis especiallytrueofeditors，who by nature tend to be eager and engaged participants in everythingⅡley do.Consider these scenarios： It’S late in the day.That front-page package you’ve been working on is nearly complete；one lastedit and it’s finished.Enter the executive editor,who makes a suggestion requiring a more than-modestrearrangement of the design and the addition of an information box.You want to scream：No！It’Sdone！''What to you do？The first role of saying no to the boss is don’t say no.She probably has something in mind whenshe makes suggestion，and it’S up to you to find out what.The second rule is don’t raise the stakes bychallenging her authority.That issue is already decided.The third rule is to be ready to cite options and consequences.The boss’S suggestions might be appropriate，but there are always consequences.She mightnot know about the pages backing up that need attention，or about the designer who had to go home sick.Tell her she Can have what she wants，but explain the consequences.Understand what she’S trying to accomplish and propose a Plan B that will make it happen without destroying what you’ve done SO far. Here’S another case.Your least-favorite reporter suggests a dumb story idea.This one should be easy,but it's not.If you say no，even politely,you risk inhibiting further ideas，not just from that reporter,but from others who heard that you turned down the idea.This scenario is common in newsrooms thatlack a systematic way to filter story suggestions. Two steps are necessary.First,you need a system for how stories are proposed and reviewed.ReportersCantolerate rejectionoftheirideasiftheybelievetheyweregivenafairhearing.Yourgutreaction（本能反应）anddismissive rejection，evenofaworthlessidea,mightnotqualifyas systematicoffair.Second.the people you work with need to negotiate a“What if...？”agreement covering“Whatif my idea is turned down？”How are people expected to react？Is there an appeal process？Can they refine the idea resubmit it？By anticipating“What if...？”situations before they happen.you can reach understanding that will help ease you out of confrontations.