未来教育.全国英语等级考试写作黄金模版第四级 9787119088464

配送至
$ $ USD 美元

编辑推荐

为了帮助广大考生进一步了解全国英语等级考试(以下简称:PETS),有效地备考和实战,全国英语等级考试教材编写组、全国英语等级考试命题研究中心以及未来教育教学与研究中心等在认真研究2015版考试大纲和历年真题规律后,精心编写了本套贴近考试要点的辅导丛书——《PETS写作黄金模板》。
本书以2015版考试大纲为准绳,从真题入手,剖析真题题型特点;对PETS四级写作题型进行分析,点拨同类试题的解题思路,让考生熟悉命题规律;增强理解能力,掌握突破写作考试的应对策略;准确把握考试要求,精心编写贴近PETS考试难度的试题,供考生练习使用。

媒体推荐

未来教育是国内较早致力于PETS考试研究的文化出版机构之一,自1999年PETS考试开始,一直在PETS考试研究领域起着领跑者作用。十多年来,因为引领,所以。教育成就未来。PETS图书,精品图书,认准未来教育。

作者简介

未来教育教学与研究中心是一家专门从事教育产品策划、研发、销售的高新知识企业。专业研究等考19年,拥有着专业的教师团队,与电子工业、人民邮电、电子科技大学等多个大型国家出版社合作,每年累积为数万余名考生服务。

目录

第1章 概述
第一节 PETS四级考试概述
第二节 PETS四级写作高分策略

第2章写作黄金模板
第一节 写作的基本要素——词汇、句子、段落
第二节 写作黄金模板

第3章 写作预测及经典范文
第一节 预测作文
第二节 经典范文

第4章 写作百宝箱
第一节 热点词汇及短语
第二节 名人名言及谚语

附录

文摘

Section III Writing
Directions:
61. Read the following text(s) and write an essay to
1) summarize the main points of the text(s),
2) make clear your own viewpoint,and
3) justify your stand.
In your essay,make full use of the information provided in the text(s). If you use more than three consecutive words from the text(s),use quotation marks (“”).
You should write 160~200 words on the ANSWER SHEET.
There is a paradox in people’s thinking about the wilderness. They think uninhabited wilderness have a value simply in not being touched by humans and thus seek to preserve them at the same time wanting to visit them. In practice,the desire to visit tends to win,which puts the preservationist in a bind. If people visit,they put a value on what they visit that may make them more interested in its conservation. But what is being conserved is no longer wilderness.
The preservation of truly untouched wilderness has to put a value on nature over and above what nature may offer to humans. And such a value system imposes real costs. The earth has resources that people need,especially at a time when the population is still growing and billions are desperately poor. Should some of those resources be put offlimits because some people place an aesthetic or moral value on the wildernesses where they are to be found? Or should a utilitarian approach be taken,accepting that human needs come before the needs that humans imagine for nature? Some might even argue that wildernesses are particularly good places for mines and oilfields—better,if something goes wrong,that there be no humans around to get hurt.
If resources are taken from the wilderness something is gained. But is something also lost—even if the resources are taken out cleanly and without degradation,and if the resulting human presence is respectful? That is the question at the heart of this debate: what,exactly,is lost in such circumstances,and what is its value?
Sample Script 1
People respect the wilderness. But when it comes to a balance between a heart willing to preserve untouched wilderness and the reality every nation on this planet tends to exploit more for the survival of an increasing number of humanity,everything becomes a dilemma.
The text demonstrates this prevament full of concerns and worries. Should we impose our needs on these places by stretching them to limit and transplanting industrious risks on them for the security of human? If we do that,what if the result pays little? But if we don’t,what about our needs?
Personally speaking,it’s an issue of value and needs,especially for the uncertainty. When we have needs,we are saturated with strong desires to meet and fulfill them. So we turn into external for help and assistant. However,not everything can be used and employed. We are bound to make evolution. By which I mean,we have to appraise those we can find and make sure it is worthwhile to make use of them. Yet under lots of circumstance,we have such an obscure vision that hardly can we judge the value. In this case,such as the wilderness we have been discussing,we begin to ponder a situation,where we make exploitation and perhaps do harm to them only to find that it’s not worth it.
However,as far as I can see,we have to make that choice. Without any doubt should we determine to make use of untouched wilderness for our needs. On the one hand,our fellow’s survival goes first. We have to make sure they can survive. On the other hand,taking risks to use them is the only opportunity for us to discover more valuable things for the development of progression of the human race. To end the essay,I want to say that,the wilderness values only when we need it.
评语
内容内容完整,综述清楚,主旨明确,阐述合理充分。
多样性句式结构多样;较灵活地使用了简单句和复合句等句式;使用了丰富的单词和词组,如:“dilemma”“are saturated with”“are bound to”“obscure”等。
结构与连贯性结构完整,条理清晰。正确使用了恰当的衔接手段,如:“however”“yet”“On the one hand”“On the other hand”等。
格式与语域符合语域要求,格式正确。
目标读者信息传达清晰,读者可完全理解作者的意图。
准确性语言准确性高,但有个别语法错误,如拼写错误:“prevament”。
档次5
Sample Script 2
People often have paradox thinking about things around them. On one hand they want to get value from things. On the other hand they don’t want thing go wrong. protect them from bad to wrose.
Some time we can’t live without the resources but we also don’t want to make our life too simple.so we should balance the value and lost between what we get and what we will lost from what we have done.
We can never make thing prefect,but we can choose which is the most importment.Sometimes we may have a long eye from the future.We can find a better ansower. We should think how to make thing better.
评语
内容提及了试题的要点,但对材料内容的概述不够清楚,自己观点的分析和论述不充分。
多样性语法结构简单,词汇使用有限。
结构与连贯性结构尚完整;因缺少恰当的衔接手法,连贯性差。
格式与语域 格式一般,语域基本恰当。
目标读者大部分语句尚可理解,但由于语言使用能力较差,语言错误较多,导致表述含混不清,影响理解。
准确性语言运用存在较多语法和词汇问题,如:“...want thing go wrong”“protect them from bad to wrose”“importment”等。
档次2
ISBN9787119088464
出版社外文出版社
作者全国英语等级考试教材编写组
尺寸32