编辑推荐
《英语辩论基础》由中国广播影视出版社出版。
作者简介
林海春，瑞典马尔默大学研究员，瑞典隆德大学博士，现任中国传媒大学“英播播音与主持”教研主任。
目录
1.Background背景
1.1 Definition定义
1.1.1 What Is Debate？
1.2 Key Questions关键问题
1.2.1 What Does“Debating”Mean？
1.2.2 How Does Debating Work？（“Parliamentary Debating”as a case）
1.2.3 How Did Debating Start？
1.3 Case：Original Background of Parliamentary Debate初始背景
1.3.1 PD in Westem System
1.3.2 BP of PD for Tournament
1.3.3 Debating for Western Mental Orientation
1.4 Aim of the Course课程目的
1.4.1 General Information
1.4.2 Why Is This Course？
1.4.3 Aim of the Course
Part Ⅰ Value Debating价值辩论
2.Basic Terms and Debating Skills基本术语及辩论技巧
2.1 Concepts概念
2.1.1 What Is a Motion？（Debating Topicl
2.1.2 Definition OfContents ofMotion
2.1.3 Team—line to Hold
2.1.4 The Rebuttal
2.1.53M.Matter Method Manner
2.2 Basic Rules：The Roles of the Debaters基本条件：辩手之角色
2.3 Case.studies（Value Debating）案例研究
Part Ⅱ Parliamentary Debating议会制辩论
3.Background of Parliamentary Debate议会建制背景
3.1 Parliamentary system议会制
3.1.1 Background and Advantages of a parliamentary system
3.1.2 Criticisms of Parliamentarianism
3.1.3 Countries with a parliamentary system of government
3.1.4 Parliamentary Leader
3.2 Background of Debating Chamber辩论议事厅的背景
3.3 Key Questions关键问题
3.4 The Guideto American Parliamentary Debate“美式议会制辩论”导读
3.4.1 Overview of American Parliamentary Debate
3.4.2 The debaters and the speeches
3.5 Guidelines and Conventions about American Parliamentary Debate“美式议会制辩论”指南及条例
3.5.1 American Parliamentary Debate is a formal contest featuring critical analysis，rhetorical skill，and wit
3.5.2 A resolution is presented as the subject for debate
3.5.3 Two types offormal speeches in each round ofdebate
3.5.4 The purpose of constructive speeches is to introduce the foundational arguments of the debate
3.5.5 The rebuttal speeches provide the final summary positions of each team in the debate
3.5.6 Modified form ofparliamentary procedure is used in the debate
3.5.7 No prepared materials may be brought into the debate round for the debater’S use
3.5.8 Sample topics
3.6 On Parliamentary Debate of American Style试析“美式议会制辩论”
3.6.1 The Nature of Parliamentary Debate
3.6.2 Focus on Extemporaneous Debate
3.6.3 Focus on Informed Debate
3.6.4 Focus on Reasoned Debate
3.6.5 Focus on Public Debate
3.6.6 The American Parliamentary Debate Format
3.7 American Parliamentary Debate美式议会制辩论
3.8 Study—case—1：Training Session of American Parliamentary Debate
学习个案—1：“美式议会制辩论”训练环节
3.9 British Parliamentary Debate英式议会制辩论
3.9.1 The political system in the UK
3.9.2 An Introduction to British Parliamentary Debate
3.9.3 Four—Team Parliamentary Debate Rules
3.9.4 Study—cases—2：Training Session of British Parliamentary
Debate学习个案—2：“英式议会制辩论”训练
Part Ⅲ Cross—Examination Debating盘问式辩论
4.1 Why Is Cross—examination Important？为什么盘问重要？
4.2 Why Do We Conduct Cross—examination？为什么我们进行盘问？
4.3 What Are the Goals of Cross.examination？盘问的目标是什么？
4.4 How should the questioner conduct cross—examination？提问者如何驾驭盘问？
4.4.1 Adopt a Formal Stance
4.4.2 Prioritize Your Questions
4.4.3 Don’t Make Speeches
4.4.4 Anticipate the Answer
4.4.5 Group Your Questions
4.4.6 Be Fair.
4.4.7 Control the Time
4.4.8 Control Your Style
4.4.9 Use What You Elicit
4.5 Can We Understand an Example of Cross—examination？你能理解盘问的一个例子吗？
4.6 How Should the Witness Act During Cross—examination？在盘问过程中目击者如何表现？
4.6.1 Adopt a Formal Stance
4.6.2 Be Direct
4.6.3 Be Honest
4.6.4 Answer，Don’t Ask
4.6.7 Think Ahead
4.6.8 Remain Poised
4.7 What Is the Most Common Cross.examination Question？什么是最普遍的盘问问题？
4.8 Rules of Cross.Examination Debate“盘问式辩论”的规则
4.9 Training Case of Cross—examination Debate“盘问式辩论”训练案例
Conclusion总结
Appendices附录
Appendix—1：国际英语辩论界对重量别的赛事规则的介绍
Appendix—2：参加“全国英语辩论赛”的选手之参赛体会和收获
Appendix—3：在《英语辩论》课设计的实训里，经过历练和锤打后的参与者们获得的认识与感悟
References参考文献
结束语
文摘
版权页：
第三点：“亮出观点”后，就需进行周密的理论了。这也是辩手素质得以体现的时候了。作为正方一辩，此时最需做的就是提供给在辩论现场的所有人有关辩题中的关键词的定义。本场实训的正方一辩在此刻，是很准确地将辩题中的关键词“honesty”、“best”及“policy”的含义及之间的关系进行了简要的阐明。这就足以为即将展开的“理论理论”铺就了“你来我往”的“唇枪舌剑”之路。
第四点：在展开理论的时候，本场实训的正方一辩用了“Following are myindividual points”这是非常清楚的表述语句，不仅使听者立刻知道辩手要说的内容，而且还将前面的内容划出了一个分离点。这种表述方式看似简单，但是在语速较快的辩论过程中，这仅仅简单的一句话，就可使得语言表达显得清晰和简明。同时，也提醒我们：完全不必用复杂的语句。
《英语辩论基础》由中国广播影视出版社出版。
作者简介
林海春，瑞典马尔默大学研究员，瑞典隆德大学博士，现任中国传媒大学“英播播音与主持”教研主任。
目录
1.Background背景
1.1 Definition定义
1.1.1 What Is Debate？
1.2 Key Questions关键问题
1.2.1 What Does“Debating”Mean？
1.2.2 How Does Debating Work？（“Parliamentary Debating”as a case）
1.2.3 How Did Debating Start？
1.3 Case：Original Background of Parliamentary Debate初始背景
1.3.1 PD in Westem System
1.3.2 BP of PD for Tournament
1.3.3 Debating for Western Mental Orientation
1.4 Aim of the Course课程目的
1.4.1 General Information
1.4.2 Why Is This Course？
1.4.3 Aim of the Course
Part Ⅰ Value Debating价值辩论
2.Basic Terms and Debating Skills基本术语及辩论技巧
2.1 Concepts概念
2.1.1 What Is a Motion？（Debating Topicl
2.1.2 Definition OfContents ofMotion
2.1.3 Team—line to Hold
2.1.4 The Rebuttal
2.1.53M.Matter Method Manner
2.2 Basic Rules：The Roles of the Debaters基本条件：辩手之角色
2.3 Case.studies（Value Debating）案例研究
Part Ⅱ Parliamentary Debating议会制辩论
3.Background of Parliamentary Debate议会建制背景
3.1 Parliamentary system议会制
3.1.1 Background and Advantages of a parliamentary system
3.1.2 Criticisms of Parliamentarianism
3.1.3 Countries with a parliamentary system of government
3.1.4 Parliamentary Leader
3.2 Background of Debating Chamber辩论议事厅的背景
3.3 Key Questions关键问题
3.4 The Guideto American Parliamentary Debate“美式议会制辩论”导读
3.4.1 Overview of American Parliamentary Debate
3.4.2 The debaters and the speeches
3.5 Guidelines and Conventions about American Parliamentary Debate“美式议会制辩论”指南及条例
3.5.1 American Parliamentary Debate is a formal contest featuring critical analysis，rhetorical skill，and wit
3.5.2 A resolution is presented as the subject for debate
3.5.3 Two types offormal speeches in each round ofdebate
3.5.4 The purpose of constructive speeches is to introduce the foundational arguments of the debate
3.5.5 The rebuttal speeches provide the final summary positions of each team in the debate
3.5.6 Modified form ofparliamentary procedure is used in the debate
3.5.7 No prepared materials may be brought into the debate round for the debater’S use
3.5.8 Sample topics
3.6 On Parliamentary Debate of American Style试析“美式议会制辩论”
3.6.1 The Nature of Parliamentary Debate
3.6.2 Focus on Extemporaneous Debate
3.6.3 Focus on Informed Debate
3.6.4 Focus on Reasoned Debate
3.6.5 Focus on Public Debate
3.6.6 The American Parliamentary Debate Format
3.7 American Parliamentary Debate美式议会制辩论
3.8 Study—case—1：Training Session of American Parliamentary Debate
学习个案—1：“美式议会制辩论”训练环节
3.9 British Parliamentary Debate英式议会制辩论
3.9.1 The political system in the UK
3.9.2 An Introduction to British Parliamentary Debate
3.9.3 Four—Team Parliamentary Debate Rules
3.9.4 Study—cases—2：Training Session of British Parliamentary
Debate学习个案—2：“英式议会制辩论”训练
Part Ⅲ Cross—Examination Debating盘问式辩论
4.1 Why Is Cross—examination Important？为什么盘问重要？
4.2 Why Do We Conduct Cross—examination？为什么我们进行盘问？
4.3 What Are the Goals of Cross.examination？盘问的目标是什么？
4.4 How should the questioner conduct cross—examination？提问者如何驾驭盘问？
4.4.1 Adopt a Formal Stance
4.4.2 Prioritize Your Questions
4.4.3 Don’t Make Speeches
4.4.4 Anticipate the Answer
4.4.5 Group Your Questions
4.4.6 Be Fair.
4.4.7 Control the Time
4.4.8 Control Your Style
4.4.9 Use What You Elicit
4.5 Can We Understand an Example of Cross—examination？你能理解盘问的一个例子吗？
4.6 How Should the Witness Act During Cross—examination？在盘问过程中目击者如何表现？
4.6.1 Adopt a Formal Stance
4.6.2 Be Direct
4.6.3 Be Honest
4.6.4 Answer，Don’t Ask
4.6.7 Think Ahead
4.6.8 Remain Poised
4.7 What Is the Most Common Cross.examination Question？什么是最普遍的盘问问题？
4.8 Rules of Cross.Examination Debate“盘问式辩论”的规则
4.9 Training Case of Cross—examination Debate“盘问式辩论”训练案例
Conclusion总结
Appendices附录
Appendix—1：国际英语辩论界对重量别的赛事规则的介绍
Appendix—2：参加“全国英语辩论赛”的选手之参赛体会和收获
Appendix—3：在《英语辩论》课设计的实训里，经过历练和锤打后的参与者们获得的认识与感悟
References参考文献
结束语
文摘
版权页：
第三点：“亮出观点”后，就需进行周密的理论了。这也是辩手素质得以体现的时候了。作为正方一辩，此时最需做的就是提供给在辩论现场的所有人有关辩题中的关键词的定义。本场实训的正方一辩在此刻，是很准确地将辩题中的关键词“honesty”、“best”及“policy”的含义及之间的关系进行了简要的阐明。这就足以为即将展开的“理论理论”铺就了“你来我往”的“唇枪舌剑”之路。
第四点：在展开理论的时候，本场实训的正方一辩用了“Following are myindividual points”这是非常清楚的表述语句，不仅使听者立刻知道辩手要说的内容，而且还将前面的内容划出了一个分离点。这种表述方式看似简单，但是在语速较快的辩论过程中，这仅仅简单的一句话，就可使得语言表达显得清晰和简明。同时，也提醒我们：完全不必用复杂的语句。
| ISBN | 9787504377975 |
|---|---|
| 出版社 | 中国广播影视出版社 |
| 作者 | 林海春 |
| 尺寸 | 16 |