编辑推荐
《人际关系管理模式的跨文化语用研究:基于中英大学校园电子邮件的语料》聚焦于信息时代工作场所（大学校园）学生与老师之间的学术请求电子邮件开展问卷调查，收集真实可靠的语料，综合关系管理（rapport managemem）和关系操作（relational work）等话语礼貌理论研究的最新进展，来构建一个可以全面分析和评估话语在各个层面的关系管理策略的理论和应用框架。
作者简介
朱武汉，江苏兴化人，英国谢菲尔德大学哲学博士（英语语言学方向），浙江外国语学院副教授。研究方向为语用学、应用语言学等。在国际和国内外语类重要学术期刊发表论文十余篇，参编教材及翻译作品三部，完成多项学术课题研究，目前独立主持浙江省哲社课题、省教改课题以及中国博士后面上资助课题各一项。
目录
List of Tables
List of Figures
Abbreviations
序一
序二
前言
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Motivations and General Introduction of the Study
1.1.1 Theoretical motivations
1.1.2 Empirical and practical motivations
1.1.3 Summary and intended research contributions
1.2 Research Aims and Research Questions
1.3 Organization of the Book
Chapter 2 Literature Review and the Theoretical Framework for the Study
2.1 Cultural Dimensions
2.1.1 Defining 'culture'
2.1.2 Cross—cultural pragmatics
2.1.3 Intercultural communication and interlanguage pragmatics
2.1.4 British and Chinese culture and social relations （teacher— student ）
2.1.5 Summary
2.2 Politeness Theories
2.2.1 Defining politeness
2.2.2 Traditional politeness theories
2.2.2.1 Maxim—／Rule—based view on politeness
2.2.2.2 Face—management view on politeness
2.2.2.3 Summary： Critical thinking on the traditional work
2.2.3 Discursive approach to politeness
2.2.3.1 Rapport—management view on politeness
2.2.3.2 Relational work view on politeness： Locher and Watts ...
2.2.3.3 Summary
2.2.4 Synthesizing politeness theories for the current study
2.2.4.1 Rethinking the criticism of discursive politeness theories
2.2.4.2 A comparison between the theory of Spencer—Oatey and that of Locher and Watts
2.2.4.3 Conclusion： Incorporating Spencer—Oatey's and Locher and Watts' theories into the current study
2.2.5 Summary
2.3 The Guiding Theoretical Framework for the Study
2.4 Summary
Chapter 3 Empirical Research Context
3.1 Research on Requests
3.1.1 Requests and politeness
3.1.2 Empirical studies on requests
3.1.3 Summary and implications for the present study
3.2 Request Emails
3.2.1 Studies on emall communication
3.2.2 Request emails from students to university instructors — previous studies
3.2.3 Implications and inadequacies in the empirical studies
3.2.4 Summary
3.3 Empirical Studies Building upon Theories of Rapport Management and Relational Work
3.3.1 Empirical studies in application of rapport management framework
3.3.2 Empirical studies building upon the framework of relational work
3.4 Summary
Chapter 4 Methodology
4.1 Research Participants： Three Discourse Communities
4.1.1 Participants
4.1.2 Discourse communities
4.2 Instruments
4.3 Procedures for Data Collection
4.4 Variables and Proposed Data Analysis
4.4.1 Variables operationalization
4.4.2 Coding framework of the study
4.4.2.1 Moves and their functions
4.4.2.2 Coding framework of requestive strategies of head acts ...
4.4.3 Procedures for data analysis
4.5 Ethical Considerations
4.6 Summary
Chapter 5 Results
5.1 Requestive Aims and Perceived Imposition of the Requests
5.1.1 Requestive aims of the emalls
5.1.2 Perceived imposition of the requests in the emails
5.2 Rapport—management Strategies
5.2.1 Move analysis of the emails
5.2.2 Moves serving rapport management （Discourse domain）
5.2.3 Openings and closings （Discourse domain and stylistic domain ）
5.2.4 Rhetorical strategies （Discourse domain）
5.2.5 Requestive strategies of head acts （Illocutionary domain）
5.2.6 Mitigation features in English request emails （Stylistic domain）
5.2.6.1 Syntactic mitigation modifiers
5.2.6.2 Lexicai modifiers
5.2.7 Summary
5.3 Perception of Social Distance and Sociopragmatie Interactional Principles
5.3.1 Perceived social distance between email writers and recipients
5.3.2 Perceived importance of the Sociopragmatic luteractional Principles （SIPs）
5.4 Summary
……
Chapter 6 Relational Work： A Discursive Perspective on Linguistic Behaviour
Chapter 7 Discussion
Chapter 8 Conclusion
References
Appendixes
文摘
版权页：
As shown in Chapter 5， more than 80.3% of emails in the CS discourse community used conventionally direct strategies in the requesting move.More specifically， 'the direct request was rendered syntactically in the form of imperatives， direct questions， want statements， and expectation statements.The conventionally direct strategies thus could be regarded as unmarked ／ appropriate ways of requesting by the CSs.
Alternatively， the indirect strategies， which were rendered in syntactic form as query preparatory， appeared in 19.7% emails in this discourse community.It could thus be regarded as marked behaviour.Moreover，indirect requests can mitigate the imposition of the request and thus reduce the threat to the recipient's negative face or uphold the recipient's equity rights.Therefore， it is positively evaluated from the researcher's perspective.It is hence open for an interpretation as polite.
《人际关系管理模式的跨文化语用研究:基于中英大学校园电子邮件的语料》聚焦于信息时代工作场所（大学校园）学生与老师之间的学术请求电子邮件开展问卷调查，收集真实可靠的语料，综合关系管理（rapport managemem）和关系操作（relational work）等话语礼貌理论研究的最新进展，来构建一个可以全面分析和评估话语在各个层面的关系管理策略的理论和应用框架。
作者简介
朱武汉，江苏兴化人，英国谢菲尔德大学哲学博士（英语语言学方向），浙江外国语学院副教授。研究方向为语用学、应用语言学等。在国际和国内外语类重要学术期刊发表论文十余篇，参编教材及翻译作品三部，完成多项学术课题研究，目前独立主持浙江省哲社课题、省教改课题以及中国博士后面上资助课题各一项。
目录
List of Tables
List of Figures
Abbreviations
序一
序二
前言
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Motivations and General Introduction of the Study
1.1.1 Theoretical motivations
1.1.2 Empirical and practical motivations
1.1.3 Summary and intended research contributions
1.2 Research Aims and Research Questions
1.3 Organization of the Book
Chapter 2 Literature Review and the Theoretical Framework for the Study
2.1 Cultural Dimensions
2.1.1 Defining 'culture'
2.1.2 Cross—cultural pragmatics
2.1.3 Intercultural communication and interlanguage pragmatics
2.1.4 British and Chinese culture and social relations （teacher— student ）
2.1.5 Summary
2.2 Politeness Theories
2.2.1 Defining politeness
2.2.2 Traditional politeness theories
2.2.2.1 Maxim—／Rule—based view on politeness
2.2.2.2 Face—management view on politeness
2.2.2.3 Summary： Critical thinking on the traditional work
2.2.3 Discursive approach to politeness
2.2.3.1 Rapport—management view on politeness
2.2.3.2 Relational work view on politeness： Locher and Watts ...
2.2.3.3 Summary
2.2.4 Synthesizing politeness theories for the current study
2.2.4.1 Rethinking the criticism of discursive politeness theories
2.2.4.2 A comparison between the theory of Spencer—Oatey and that of Locher and Watts
2.2.4.3 Conclusion： Incorporating Spencer—Oatey's and Locher and Watts' theories into the current study
2.2.5 Summary
2.3 The Guiding Theoretical Framework for the Study
2.4 Summary
Chapter 3 Empirical Research Context
3.1 Research on Requests
3.1.1 Requests and politeness
3.1.2 Empirical studies on requests
3.1.3 Summary and implications for the present study
3.2 Request Emails
3.2.1 Studies on emall communication
3.2.2 Request emails from students to university instructors — previous studies
3.2.3 Implications and inadequacies in the empirical studies
3.2.4 Summary
3.3 Empirical Studies Building upon Theories of Rapport Management and Relational Work
3.3.1 Empirical studies in application of rapport management framework
3.3.2 Empirical studies building upon the framework of relational work
3.4 Summary
Chapter 4 Methodology
4.1 Research Participants： Three Discourse Communities
4.1.1 Participants
4.1.2 Discourse communities
4.2 Instruments
4.3 Procedures for Data Collection
4.4 Variables and Proposed Data Analysis
4.4.1 Variables operationalization
4.4.2 Coding framework of the study
4.4.2.1 Moves and their functions
4.4.2.2 Coding framework of requestive strategies of head acts ...
4.4.3 Procedures for data analysis
4.5 Ethical Considerations
4.6 Summary
Chapter 5 Results
5.1 Requestive Aims and Perceived Imposition of the Requests
5.1.1 Requestive aims of the emalls
5.1.2 Perceived imposition of the requests in the emails
5.2 Rapport—management Strategies
5.2.1 Move analysis of the emails
5.2.2 Moves serving rapport management （Discourse domain）
5.2.3 Openings and closings （Discourse domain and stylistic domain ）
5.2.4 Rhetorical strategies （Discourse domain）
5.2.5 Requestive strategies of head acts （Illocutionary domain）
5.2.6 Mitigation features in English request emails （Stylistic domain）
5.2.6.1 Syntactic mitigation modifiers
5.2.6.2 Lexicai modifiers
5.2.7 Summary
5.3 Perception of Social Distance and Sociopragmatie Interactional Principles
5.3.1 Perceived social distance between email writers and recipients
5.3.2 Perceived importance of the Sociopragmatic luteractional Principles （SIPs）
5.4 Summary
……
Chapter 6 Relational Work： A Discursive Perspective on Linguistic Behaviour
Chapter 7 Discussion
Chapter 8 Conclusion
References
Appendixes
文摘
版权页：
As shown in Chapter 5， more than 80.3% of emails in the CS discourse community used conventionally direct strategies in the requesting move.More specifically， 'the direct request was rendered syntactically in the form of imperatives， direct questions， want statements， and expectation statements.The conventionally direct strategies thus could be regarded as unmarked ／ appropriate ways of requesting by the CSs.
Alternatively， the indirect strategies， which were rendered in syntactic form as query preparatory， appeared in 19.7% emails in this discourse community.It could thus be regarded as marked behaviour.Moreover，indirect requests can mitigate the imposition of the request and thus reduce the threat to the recipient's negative face or uphold the recipient's equity rights.Therefore， it is positively evaluated from the researcher's perspective.It is hence open for an interpretation as polite.
| ISBN | 9787544645263 |
|---|---|
| 出版社 | 上海外语教育出版社 |
| 作者 | 朱武汉 |
| 尺寸 | 32 |